Bard Avaulta Vaginal Mesh Lawyers | Bladder Sling Attorneys | Mesh Lawsuits

 

Bard Avaulta Vaginal Mesh Lawyers

Bard Avaulta vaginal mesh lawyers at our firm are currently interviewing women who were harmed by this product for potential medical product liability lawsuits.  Vaginal mesh, made by C.R. Bard and a number of other manufacturers, has been proven to cause serious injury and pain to women who have been implanted with this product as surgical treatment for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence.

If you have received Bard Avaulta or another model of Bard vaginal mesh, you may be entitled to significant monetary compensation for your damages.  Contact a dangerous medical device lawyer to learn more about your legal rights in a free consultation.  At Kelley, Bernheim, and Dolinsky, L.L.C., our nationally respected lawyers provide for each of our clients:

  • Dedicated personal attention
  • Free legal consultations
  • No legal fees unless we win your Bard vaginal mesh lawsuit
  • Home and hospital visits at your convenience


Bard Avaulta Vaginal Mesh Problems

Women who have undergone surgery with Bard vaginal mesh have suffered the following complications:

  • Pain
  • Infection
  • Granuloma formation
  • Fistula formation
  • Mesh erosion
  • Mesh shrinkage
  • Mesh contraction
  • Recurrence  of POP
  • Pain during urination
  • Urinary incontinence
  • Pain during intercourse
  • Perforation of nearby organs
  • Hardening of mesh
  • Scarring


Bard Vaginal Mesh Models

Also known as bladder sling, bladder neck suspension, and ObTape, transvaginal mesh is produced by a number of manufacturers, and each medical device maker fabricates a number of different models of mesh.  Below is a list of products made by C.R. Bard that have become the subject of vaginal mesh lawsuits:

  • Avaulta Plus™ 
  • BioSynthetic Support System 
  • Avaulta Solo™ 
  • Synthetic Support System
  • Faslata® Allograft
  • Align
  • Pelvicol ® Tissue
  • PelviSoft® Biomesh
  • Pelvitex™ Polypropylene Mesh 
  • Pelvilace
  • Uretex
  • Ugytex


Vaginal Mesh Lawsuits

Experts at the 2004 World Health Organization 3rd International Consultation on Incontinence studied the unacceptably high rate of vaginal mesh failure associated with products made by C.R. Bard and a number of other manufacturers.  They concluded that pelvic mesh presents no benefit over other surgical methods to treat pelvic organ prolapse.    So why do these products continue to be used?

In Bard vaginal mesh lawsuits, our attorneys can argue that Bard placed their need for profit over the safety of the women who receive their products.  They displayed gross negligence in making and marketing a product that was known to be unsafe, and they were also negligent in their failure to provide sufficient warning as to the risks linked to Bard vaginal mesh.

If you have been harmed by Bard vaginal mesh or any other brand of vaginal mesh, it’s our duty to ensure that you recover full and just compensation in a dangerous medical device lawsuit.  Victims of Bard mesh are entitled to collect compensation for a number of damages, which may include medical bills, pharmacy costs, pain and suffering, and loss of consortium.


Contact Our Bard Vaginal Mesh & Bladder Sling Lawyers

If you have suffered after surgery to fix pelvic organ prolapse or stress urinary incontinence and would like to pursue a dangerous medical device lawsuit for compensation, it is not necessary for you to know the exact make and model of the mesh used in your operation.  The highly experienced medical product liability lawyers at our firm can track that information down for you.  You may be entitled to substantial legal compensation for your medical bills, pain and suffering, and other damages, but you need to act now.  A statute of limitations could infringe on your rights if you wait too long to file a Bard vaginal mesh lawsuit.  Contact us today to take the first step with a free legal consultation.